Review Policy 

IJSK shall not publish research papers in its journals without prior peer review. There shall be a review process by one or more independent referees who are acquainted in the relevant theme.

Editors of IJSK shall follow the review procedure which shall be clearly well-defined.

Authors must ensure the maximum clarity of manifestation, keeping in mind that the objective of publication is the revelation of technical knowledge and that an extremely complex or poorly written presentation can only vague the implication of the work presented. Material which is not critical to the connection of the text (e.g., proofs, derivations, or calculations) be placed in Appendices.

Referees before publication should not release the confidential information of the contents of papers to others which are under reviewed.

Periodicals which are published shall have a review policy that ensures the eminence of the papers. This policy should be generally consistent with the IJKS review policy contained in Policy “Publication Standards for Authors, Editors and Referees”.

The editor evaluates the recommendation and notifies the author of the manuscript status. The manuscript may be:

  1. Accepted for publication as is
  2. Accepted for publication with minor changes, with no re-review necessary
  3. Accepted for publication after substantial revision and additional review, or
  4. Rejected

The explanations of the will be forwarded to the authors, and revisions must be completed and submitted within two weeks after the authors received the reviewers’ comments. Late manuscripts may be rejected.

Material which has been formerly copyrighted, published, or accepted for publication will not be considered for publication in the journals.

The review process shall certify that all authors have equal opportunity for publication of their papers. Acceptance and scheduling of publication of papers in these periodicals shall not be hampered by added standards and measures beyond those controlled in the review process